Legal Opinion

State v. Arakaki

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided August 28, 1987No. 11600; D.C. NOS. 86-3313, 86-3312, 86-3314 AND 86-2283PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

TANAKA, J.

This is an appeal by defendant Larry N. Arakaki (Defendant) of his convictions for operating a motor vehicle not insured under a no-fault policy (insurance violation) contrary to the provisions of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 294-8(a) (1) (1985), 1 and for driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor (DUI) in violation of HRS § 291-4(a)(2) (1985). 2 Defendant contends that (I) the State failed to prove the insurance violation beyond a reasonable doubt and (2) since there was inadequate foundation for the admission of the intoxilyzer test result into…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Greene v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. TateoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. MalufauHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. DowHawaii Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. WetzelHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. State v. OfaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. State v. WackerHawaii Supreme Court · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API