Legal Opinion
Hill v. Marston
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 17, 1936No. 6516PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBB, Associate Justice.
Appeal from a decree in the Supreme Court of the District declaring null and void two contracts for the purchase of shore lots at Manhattan Beach on Chesapeake Bay and awarding recovery of money paid under those contracts by appellee (plaintiff below).
According to the findings of fact, plaintiff, a lady 70 years of age, became acquainted with Broussard, one of the defendants, and his sister-in-law, Mrs. Landry. Defendants Broussard, Hill, and Harrison were partners trading as the Manhattan Beach Company, with an office in the District. They and the other defendant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Southern Development Co. v. SilvaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Fay v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
- Lipski v. BurchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
- Pollock v. JamesonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
- Stern v. Moneyweight Scale Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mills v. Cosmopolitan Ins. Agcy., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Hiltpold v. SternDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
- Vincent B. Welch v. Robert W. SherwinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
- Greene v. Gibraltar Mortgage Investment Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1980
- Saylor v. Handley Motor CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.