Legal Opinion

Holland v. Grote

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1907PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Issues of law upon demurrer to answer.

1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.

This is a judgment creditor’s action to reach the proceeds of the sale of certain real property conveyed by the defendant judgment debtor to his codefendant, Ida F. Grote, without consideration, and by her conveyed to an innocent purchaser. The defendant Ida F. Grote interposes three separate defenses, to each of which the *371plaintiff has demurred for insufficiency of substance. These defenses are that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; that the plaintiff has an adequate and complete remedy at law; and that the cause of action alleged in the complaint…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kain v. . LarkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Aultman Taylor Co. v. . SymeNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Weaver v. . HavilandNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Golden v. Health DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  5. Edmonds v. SternAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holland v. GroteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  2. Patti v. United Surety Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1908
  3. Benvega v. United States Surety Co.New York Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API