Legal Opinion

Benvega v. United States Surety Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1908Published

Action by one Benvega and by one Musco against the United States Surety Company. Demurrer to complaint overruled.

1Opinion of the CourtO’Gorman, J.

This is an action brought by an assignee of a number of claims against the defendant, a surety company in the city of New York, upon a bond given by the defendant for a so-called steamship ticket agent, its principal, pursuant to chapter 185, p. 263, of the Laws of 19Ó7. This statute provided that all corporations, firms, and persons engaged in the selling of steamship or railroad tickets for transportation to or from foreign countries, who in connection with said business carry on the business of receiving deposits of money for the purpose of transmitting the same or the equivalent thereof…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vose v. . CockcroftNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. People Ex Rel. Farrington v. . MenschingNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. People Ex Rel. Armstrong v. Warden of City PrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Holland v. . GroteNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  5. Holland v. GroteNew York Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API