J. A. & E. D. Transport Co. v. Rusin

On Motion for Rehearing and Motion to Certify Questions to the Supreme Court.

It is stated in 9 Blashfield Cyclopedia of Automobile Law and Practice, Perm.Ed., § 6056, page 367, that:

“The general rule drawn from these particular cases and supported by the great weight of authority is that the fact that the *701name of the defendant was painted or inscribed in some manner on the motor vehicle which inflicted the injury sued for raises a presumption, or is prima facie evidence, that the defendant owned such vehicle, and that the driver was using it in defendant’s behalf.”.

The following Texas cases…