Legal Opinion

Duvall v. Henke

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 10, 1988No. 53504PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAROHL, Presiding Judge.

Personal representative of the estate of David Pinkerton filed a Section 473.340 RSMo 1986 petition to discover and recover various items of tangible personal property. Pinkerton was living with defendant Henke at the time of death. The trial court found that Henke was an inter vivos donee of the property. The Estate appeals.

Pinkerton and Henke met and began dating during the first two months of 1986. He moved into her apartment at the end of February or the beginning of March of 1986. While the couple lived together he moved the following items into the apartment: one…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Commonwealth Trust Co. v. DuMontimerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. In Re Estate of WintermannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  4. Wantuck v. United Savings and Loan AssociationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
  5. Davis v. ZimmermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Clippard v. PfefferkornMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Donnelly v. DonnellyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Helena Chemical Co. v. True (In Re True)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2002
  4. Washington University v. CatalonaDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2006
  5. McIntyre v. KilbournMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API