King v. Vets Cab, Inc.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Wertz, J.:
This was an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff while she was a passenger in one of defendant’s taxicabs, the ultimate theory of recovery being the failure of the taxicab driver to assist plaintiff in alighting from the cab after she had requested such assistance. Plaintiff recovered and defendant appeals.
Appellee Florence J. King will be hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, and appellant Vets Cab, Inc., as defendant, or cab company.
Inasmuch as the sufficiency of the pleadings is not in issue, it will not…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sams v. Commercial Standard InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
- Marley v. Wichita Transportation Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1939
- Clark v. Southwestern Greyhound LinesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Picou v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
- In Re Estate of ErwinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Elliott v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
- Angell v. HesterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
- Connolly v. SamuelsonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1987
- Grigsby v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
- Unruh v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.