Legal Opinion
Evans v. Carroll & Co.
District Court, D. Montana
Decided September 30, 1957No. Civ. No. 47PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMESON, District Judge.
Defendant has moved the court for an order setting aside the verdict and judgment for plaintiff and for judgment in accordance with defendant’s motion for directed verdict, or in the alternative for a new trial. Twelve grounds are specified in the motion for a directed verdict and nineteen errors are specified as grounds for a- new trial.
Plaintiff’s complaint alleges that on or about February 7, 1956, the plaintiff ordered from defendant 75,000 shares of common stock of Colotah Uranium Co., Inc., and completed the purchase thereof by payment' on March 3, 1956 of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mueller v. Technical Devices Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Scott v. WaggonerMontana Supreme Court · 1914
- Jeffries v. PankowOregon Supreme Court · 1924
- Edwards v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Williams v. International Harvester Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1943
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Peasley Transfer & Storage Co. v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- William B. Evans v. Carroll & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Foster v. First National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1961
- Shamblin's Ready Mix, Inc. v. Eaton Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987