Legal Opinion

Latta v. Catawba Electric Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 11, 1907PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Civil actioN, tried before Ward, and a jury, at May Term, 1901, of the Superior Court of GastoN County. This action was brought by plaintiff against defendants, Catawba Electric and Power Company, Eidelity and Deposit Company, Alcaeus Hooper and another, trustees of the estate of W. E. Hooper, the Woman’s College of Baltimore, and others, pursuant to Revisal, sec. 1589, for the purpose of quieting title to the lands described in the complaint.

Read the full summary

Civil actioN, tried before Ward, and a jury, at May Term, 1901, of the Superior Court of GastoN County. This action was brought by plaintiff against defendants, Catawba Electric and Power Company, Eidelity and Deposit Company, Alcaeus Hooper and another, trustees of the estate of W. E. Hooper, the Woman’s College of Baltimore, and others, pursuant to Revisal, sec. 1589, for the purpose of quieting title to the lands described in the complaint. The plaintiff claimed three tracts of land, and showed title thereto: 1st. The Bissell tract, by deed from Emily Bissell to W. T. Jordan, bearing date…

1Opinion of the Court

CoNNOR, J-,

after stating the case: The plaintiff, having shown a complete chain of title to the Bissell, the Lineberger and Sample properties, was, in view of the admissions in the answer that defendants were claiming to own said properties, or an easement in them, entitled to judgment quieting his title, unless the defendants made good either of their contentions referred to in the answer as counterclaims. The cause was well and carefully tried in the court below, and argued in this Court with more than usual learning and ability. The record contains forty assignments of error. The real…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Page v. . ShainwaldNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Bowling v. . BurtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  3. Swedish-American National Bank of Minneapolis v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  4. Carolina Coal & Ice Co. v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  5. Thompson v. . ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1854

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. FloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. State Ex Rel. Putnam v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. State ex rel. Walter v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Garner v. Tulsa Bldg. & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Trust Co. of America v. City of RhinelanderU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Wisconsin · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API