Legal Opinion

Page v. Riley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1999No. 1998-2669PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 85 Ohio St.3d 621.] PAGE ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. RILEY, JUDGE, ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Page v. Riley,

1999-Ohio-290.] Prohibition—Writ to prevent judge of common pleas court from reactivating a case and proceeding to trial—Writ denied, when. (No. 98-2669—Submitted May 18, 1999—Decided June 16, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. 17377. __________________ {¶ 1} In October 1995, appellants, Robert L. Page, Adventure Golf, Inc., an Ohio corporation, and Adventure Golf, Inc., a Michigan corporation,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fogle v. SteinerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. V Companies v. MarshallOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. The V Cos. v. MarshallOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Logsdon v. NicholsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State ex rel. Rootstown Local School District Board of Education v. Portage County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re T.A.-N.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026
  2. State ex rel. Thornburg Station Retail, Ltd. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common PleasOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API