Legal Opinion

Logsdon v. Nichols

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1995No. 94-363PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated by the court of appeals in its opinion rendered on December 16, 1993, which we adopt and attach as an appendix to this entry.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur. Wright, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur in part and dissent in part.

APPENDIX

Peggy Bryant, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellants, Kathleen Logsdon and James P. Logsdon, appeal from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas dismissing their complaint with prejudice under Civ.R. 41(B) for failure to prosecute.

Plaintiffs’ complaint, refiled after previous…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. State ex rel. Rice v. McGrathOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Nancy McKinnon Hinsdale v. The Farmers National Bank & Trust Company, Jane M. McKinnonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  4. Metcalf v. Ohio State University HospitalsOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Sturm v. SturmOhio Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Quonset Hut, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Thomas v. FreemanOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Sazima v. ChalkoOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State ex rel. SuperAmerica Group v. Licking County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Page v. RileyOhio Supreme Court · 1999

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API