Legal Opinion

Matter of Legg

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 7, 1989No. 168A89PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEYER, Justice.

The applicant contests the conclusion of the North Carolina Board of Law Examiners (Board) that he had “not satisfied the Board that he possesses the qualifications of character and general fitness requisite for an attorney and counsellor at law and that he is of such good moral character as to be entitled to the high regard and confidence of the public” and that “[f]or this reason, his application to take the North Carolina Bar Examination should be denied.” After examination of the whole record, we affirm the Board’s conclusion.

The Board made this conclusion after the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Cement InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. In Re GriffithsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Peed v. Burleson's, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. In Matter of RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Layon v. North Dakota State Bar BoardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Matter of Golia-PaladinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  3. Matter of LeggSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  4. In Re GordonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  5. In re BraunSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API