City of Tempe v. Del E. Webb Corporation
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
HOWARD, Judge.
We have not been convinced, on-motion for rehearing, that our previous de cisión in this case was incorrect. However, it has been the pattern in this jurisdiction that in tax matters, when a previous decision is overruled, the new decision is given prospective effect only. See e. g. Duhame v. State Tax Commission, 65 Ariz. 268, 179 P.2d 252 (1947); Arizona State Tax Commission v. Ensign, 75 Ariz. 376, 257 P.2d 392 (1953); Southern Pacific Co. v. Cochise County, 92 Ariz. 395, 377 P.2d 770 (1963).
Therefore, in fairness to the parties who have relied upon the previous holding of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Southern Pacific Company v. Cochise CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Duhame v. State Tax CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- Oklahoma County v. Queen City Lodge No. 197, I. O. O. F.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Arizona State Tax Commission v. EnsignArizona Supreme Court · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wilderness World, Inc. v. Department of RevenueArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- Hollywood Continental Films v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- Reed v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Adams v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Clark v. CurranCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.