Legal Opinion

Adams v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 2, 1976No. 1 CA-IC 1296PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NELSON, Presiding Judge.

This decision presents for review the question of the validity of Rule 13d, Rules of Procedure for Workmen’s Compensation Hearings Before the Industrial Commission of Arizona (November 1, 1973). We hold that Rule 13d, hereinafter quoted, as applied by the hearing officer is in excess of the statutory rule making grant to the Industrial Commission of Arizona. We also hold that the rule itself does not mandate the hearing officer’s legal conclusion and when viewed in the light of this opinion the rule does not fall within constitutional prohibitions. This holding…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Southern Pacific Company v. Cochise CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Haggard v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  4. State v. Airesearch Mfg. Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Waller v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Adams v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Fullen v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Bader v. Norfolk Redevelopment & Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1990
  4. Roberts v. Transportation Dept.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Smith v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API