Quoka v. Drapko, No. Cv91 0036714s (Nov. 25, 1992)
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION CT Page 10614 This is an action for mandamus in which the plaintiffs seek an order of the court requiring that the Oxford Board of Selectmen call a town meeting to act upon an ordinance to "make vacant, vacate, and leave vacant position of town planner." The selectmen have refused to do so.
Because the court finds that the plaintiffs have not established a clear legal right to the extraordinary remedy of mandamus, relief is denied.
The following facts are not in dispute. The town meeting serves…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Vartuli v. SotireSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Lahiff v. Saint Joseph's Total Abstinence & Benevolent SocietySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
- Hennessey v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Harlow v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- West Hartford Taxpayers Assn., Inc. v. StreeterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.