Dep't of Human Servs. v. J. E. R. (In re D. R.)

*422*389In this consolidated juvenile dependency case, mother appeals from three permanency judgments that changed the permanency plans for mother's children (C, D, and E) from reunification to adoption.1 Mother contends that the juvenile court erred in changing the permanency plans because the court determined whether DHS's efforts were reasonable based, in large part, on DHS's efforts that occurred before the juvenile court announced the basis for jurisdiction and entered dispositional orders. During that prejurisdiction period, mother was unwilling to participate in the services requested by…