Legal Opinion

Department of Human Services v. S. M. H.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 5, 2017No. BENDES09; Petition Number 14JV0194; A162054 (Control); GEEBLA13; Petition Number 14JV0194; A162055; 15JV0084; Petition Number HENSAY15; A162056PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, J.

In this consolidated juvenile dependency case, three parents separately appeal judgments of the juvenile court changing the permanency plans for three children from reunification to guardianship. All three parents were incarcerated at the time of the permanency hearing, and parents assign error to the juvenile court’s finding that the Department of Human Services (DHS) made reasonable efforts to make reunification possible as required by ORS 419B.476(2)(a). For the reasons explained below, we conclude that, as to mother, the record lacks sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Department of Human Services v. M. K.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. Department of Human Services v. N. T.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. Department of Human Services v. S. W.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. Department of Human Services v. S. S.Multnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Dep't of Human Servs. v. S.J.M. (In re L.B.M.)Oregon Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Dep't of Human Servs. v. L.L.S. (In re Z.S.)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. Dept. of Human Services v. K. G. T.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. Department of Human Services v. T.L.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  5. Dept. of Human Services v. D. M. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API