Barrese v. Standard Silk Dyeing Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Campbell, Chancellor.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court affirming an award of the compensation bureau and the judgment under review might well be affirmed upon the opinion of the Supreme Court, and, in fact, upon the meritorious questions properly before us, is so affirmed.
Appellant argues, at considerable length and with much energy, that the Supreme Court was wrong as to the facts of the case because in its opinion it states that “Oakley swung around Chirico 'in a swivel chair.’ There is no such testimony in the case. The…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Grant v. Grant Casket Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- King v. Camden Paving Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Brown v. Philmac Sportswear Co., New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau1945
- Mayes v. Walter Kidde Constructors, Inc., New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau1942