Brown v. Philmac Sportswear Co.
New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau
1Opinion of the Court
Petitioner alleged that on December 31st, 1942, she was injured while working for respondent. By its answer respondent denied that tbp. petitioner suffered an injury by accident arising out of and in the eourse of her employment. At the hearing counsel stipulated that the question of whether the petitioner sustained an accident arising out of and in the *379course of her employment he first submitted, before inquiry into the nature and extent of any disability resulting therefrom. At the conclusion of petitioner’s case on this point, respondent moved to dismiss the petition.
It appears from the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hulley v. MoosbruggerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
- Merkel v. T. A. Gillespie Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
- Emerick v. Slavonian Roman Greek Catholic UnionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1919
- Mountain Ice Co. v. McNeilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1918
- Yoshida v. NicholsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Martin v. Snuffy's Steak HouseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Petro v. Martin Baking Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953