Legal Opinion

King v. Camden Paving Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 15, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This writ of certiorari brings up for review a judgment of the Camden Common Pleas affirming an award of compensation in the workmen’s compensation bureau to the respondent.

It appears that respondent’s deceased husband, William King, was superintendent for prosecutor in the work of road *763construction. On August 12th, 1929, he was engaged in work in connection with a road near Palmyra, New Jersey. One John Pratt was engaged by prosecutor on a contract basis to remove certain tree stumps. He presented a bill for $35 which decedent approved for payment on said date. Subsequently, however, in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hulley v. MoosbruggerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
  2. Schmoll v. Weisbrod & Hess Brewing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1916
  3. Emerick v. Slavonian Roman Greek Catholic UnionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1919
  4. Mountain Ice Co. v. McNeilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1918
  5. Nevich v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hudson v. RobertsIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Brown v. Philmac Sportswear Co., New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau1945
  3. Mayes v. Walter Kidde Constructors, Inc., New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau1942
  4. Winter v. United States Gypsum Co., New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API