Legal Opinion
Glass v. Hoblitzelle
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 6, 1935No. 11961PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOONEY, Justice.
This appeal is from an interlocutory order refusing a temporary injunction. R. Z. Glass, appellant, owner and operator of two second or subsequent run motion picture theaters in the city of Dallas, brought this suit for himself and others similarly situated, against appellees, owners and operators of class A theaters in Dallas, exhibiting first-run motion pictures.
Appellant alleged in substance that, since about June 1, 1934, he (and others similarly situated) had not been able to obtain from producers and distributors motion picture films with the privilege of exhibiting same…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Canal Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Binderup v. Pathe Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Bement v. National Harrow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Mutual Film Corp. v. Industrial Commission of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Browning v. City of WaycrossSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc. v. KoppalSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Falsetti v. Local Union No. 2026, United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Cone v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Admiral Motor Hotel of Texas, Inc. v. Community Inns of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Haden Employees' Ass'n v. LovettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.