Stormans Inc v. Mary Selecky
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
Legal Voice, f/k/a Northwest Women’s Law Center (“Law Center”), appeals the district court’s denial of sanctions and costs under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(d) (“Rule 45(d)”). 1 We must determine first whether we have jurisdiction over this appeal and, if so, whether the district court abused its discretion in denying the Law Center’s requests for costs and sanctions. As to the first question, we conclude that we have jurisdiction. , As to the merits, we affirm the district court’s denial of sanctions, but reverse the district court’s denial of costs.
I
This…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dickinson v. Petroleum Conversion Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- John David v. The Hooker, Ltd Hooker Music, Ltd., Ronald Haffkine, Non-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Linder, David v. Calero-PortocarreroCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Mount Hope Church v. Bash Back!Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
3Cited by67 opinions
- Stormans Inc v. Mary SeleckyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
- Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc. v. PB & A, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Hinterberger v. American Nurses Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- Cahoo v. SAS Inst. Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.