Legal Opinion

United States v. Armando Alvarez-Lopez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 25, 1977No. 76-1257PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:

Armando Alvarez-Lopez (“Alvarez”) appeals from his conviction for conspiracy to possess and possession of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1). The question on appeal is whether the district court committed prejudicial error in refusing to permit Alvarez to inquire into the Government’s star witness’ prior arrest for smuggling narcotics. Following Alford v. United States (1931) 282 U.S. 687, 51 S.Ct. 218, 75 L.Ed. 624, and its progeny, we hold that the curtailment of cross-examination was prejudicial error of constitutional dimension requiring reversal.

T…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Greene v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Brookhart v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Springer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. United States v. RayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. Lamar Adams, United States of America v. James Lee PinkertonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  4. State v. AnthonySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  5. United States v. Gilbert M. OrtegaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API