Legal Opinion

Felts v. Shenandoah Life Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 25, 1942PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.

A copy of the insurance policy issued to James E. Felts was introduced in evidence at the trial below as well as Supplemental Contract issued in connection with and constituting a part of the Principal Contract.

We think all the exceptions of the defendant can be disposed of by a consideration of the pertinent parts of the insurance contract, which appear in the Supplemental Contract, as follows:

“Supplemental Contract issued in connection with the Company’s Policy No. 125,659, on the life of James Evert Felts, which is the Principal Contract.
“If, before default in the payment of any premium…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gerringer v. North Carolina Home InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. Gorham v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Moore v. General Accident, Fire, & Life Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. Misskelley v. Home Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Underwood v. State Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Davenport v. Travelers Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Underwood v. . Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Gardner v. Carolina InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmer's Mutual Casualty Insurance v. RobertsonDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1957
  5. Catawba Valley MacHinery Co. v. Aetna Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API