Carlson Holdings, Inc. v. NAFCO Insurance
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KYLE, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
NAFCO Insurance Company (“NAF-CO”) insured Plaintiffs (hereinafter referred to collectively as “Carlson”) under an “All Risk” property insurance policy. The remaining Defendants then reinsured NAFCO’s policy with Carlson. Carlson submitted a claim with NAFCO for expenses it incurred while preparing for the year 2000 date (hereinafter “Y2K”) problem with its computers. Before NAFCO could fully investigate Carlson’s claim, Carlson filed suit against NAFCO and its reinsurers 1 seeking a judgment declaring that the NAFCO policy covers…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Montgomery v. Compass Airlines, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
- Semler v. KlangDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- HSK, LLC v. United States Olympic CommitteeDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2017
- Anderson v. Everest National InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2013
- Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Rymer Companies, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.