Legal Opinion

Humptulips Driving Co. v. Cross

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1911No. 9809PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Chehalis county, Irwin, J., entered March 11, 1911, in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court, in an action to enjoin the sale of property under execution.

1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.

— This is a suit to enjoin the sale of property upon an alias execution for the enforcement of an attorney’s lien claimed upon a judgment. From a judgment granting a permanent injunction, the attorney claiming the lien and the sheriff who was executing the writ have appealed.

Two questions are presented: (1) Does the writ lie in cases of this character? (2) Is an assignment of a judgment, made in good faith and without collusion, subject to an attorney’s lien upon the judgment filed subsequent to the *637assignment? The facts are as follows: The Humptulips Driving Company brought a condemnation…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Heintz v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Hookway v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Ward v. SherbondySupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  4. Cline Piano Co. v. SherwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Alderman v. NelsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ahalt v. GatewoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  2. State v. HemmingsonWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Jones v. International Land Corporation Ltd.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  4. Keyes v. AhrenstedtWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Kern v. Chicago, M. & P. S. Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API