Legal Opinion

Keyes v. Ahrenstedt

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 1931No. 23184. Department OnePublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

This is an appeal by Wingate and Du-buar in their own behalf. They are attorneys for Ahrenstedt, who has a judgment rendered in his favor against Keyes in this action. They seek reversal of an order of the superior court for King county staying-proceedings in the action looking to the collection of the judgment; which order, they claim, erroneously impairs their claim of attorneys’ lien upon the judgment.

On June 1, 1928, Keyes was, by the superior court for King- county, awarded a judgment against Ahren-stedt for the sum of one thousand dollars in this action. Under an execution issued upon…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Angeles Brewing & Malting Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. In Re Estate of WrenWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Keyes v. AhrenstedtWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Humptulips Driving Co. v. CrossWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Golden v. HydeWashington Supreme Court · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. King County v. Seawest Investment Associates, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  2. King County v. SEAWEST INV. ASSOCIATES, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  3. (HC) Segura v. LizarragaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API