Legal Opinion
Pullen v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 29, 1987No. C7-87-763PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
Following her arrest for driving while under the influence, appellant Christie LaRae Pullen’s license was revoked because she failed to provide an adequate breath sample. She petitioned for judicial review, and the trial court sustained the revocation. This appeal followed. We reverse.
FACTS
Police Officer Marie Fierck Przynski was on duty at approximately 9:00 a.m. on June 2, 1986, when she responded to a radio dispatch directing her to the alley at 46th and Cedar to investigate an accident. When she arrived, she was met by the complainants, who told her that their…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Geoffrey William BrileyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. OthoudtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Carlin v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- State of Minnesota v. George Edward WilsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015