United Canneries Co. v. Seelye
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
This is an action to recover damages for an alleged breach of contract to deliver fruit. The case. was tried without a jury, findings and judgment went for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
The action was originally commenced by the Southern California Canning Company, for which corporation plaintiff here was, by proper order, substituted, the former’s rights having passed to the latter. The present plaintiff had nothing whatever to do with the making of the contract in question, or with any of the acts or transactions here involved. For convenience, therefore, the designation “plaintiff,” as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Porter v. the Arrow Head Reservoir Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Gilfallan v. GilfallanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- San Francisco Bridge Co. v. Dumbarton Land & Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Condley v. Consolidated Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921
- Puritas Coffee & Tea Co. v. De MartiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Helms v. Pacific Mill Timber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
- Cornell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
- Mathews v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.