Legal Opinion
Cahill v. Hovenden
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 2, 1942No. Nos. 2482, 2528PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRATTON, Circuit Judge.
The City of Bristow, Oklahoma, levied an assessment against the abutting property in a described district and issued paving bonds payable solely out of the proceeds of such assessment. The city owned six separate tracts or parcels of such property and they were included in the assessment. Default was made in the payment of some of the bonds, and H. C. Hovenden, owner of eight of such delinquent bonds aggregating $4000, instituted an action against the city. The complaint alleged the creation of the improvement district, the levying of the assessment, the issuance of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Shultz v. Ritterbusch, County TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Hann v. City of Clinton, Okl. Ex Rel. SchuetterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Ogden Levee Dist.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- City of McAlester v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Straughn v. BerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- John Regan, Administrator v. Donald Marshall, D/B/A Marshall's Mobilgas StationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1962
- Meyer v. City of EufaulaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- Brady v. UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2010