Legal Opinion
Meyer v. City of Eufaula
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 16, 1942No. 2665PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Circuit Judge.
In accordance with the statutory scheme prescribed by Chap. 10, Art. 1, Session Laws of 1907-1908, Revised Laws of 1910, Secs. 608-643, C.O.S.1921, 4583-4618, 11 O.S.A. § 81 et seq., the City of Eufaula, Oklahoma, by resolution of its council, authorized the issuance of Series No. 2, interest bearing “street improvement bonds” in the total sum of $44,478.95, to pay the cost of street improvements within the district which it had duly created. The bonds were issued on July 15, 1921, payable in ten annual installments on the first day of September of the years 1921 to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Meriwether v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Russell v. ToddSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Rees v. City of WatertownSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- City of Sapulpa v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Atlas Life Insurance v. W. I. Southern, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Versluis v. Town of Haskell, Okl.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
- Meyer v. City of Eufaula, Okl.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
- Board of County Commissioners v. City of Shattuck ex rel. VersluisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- Whitaker and Company v. Sewer Improvement District No. 1 of Dardanelle, ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
- Pueblo Trading Co. v. El Camino Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948