MacDougall v. State

*651OPINION ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING

TOM G. DAVIS, Judge.

Appeal is taken from a conviction for theft of property of the value of more than $200.00 but less than $10,000.00. The case was affirmed by the Eleventh Court of Appeals in an unpublished opinion (MacDougall v. State, NO. 11-84-00095-CR—6-7-84).

Appellant contends that the Court of Appeals erred in upholding the trial court’s action in refusing his request to define the term “deception”1 in its instruction to the jury. After refusing appellant’s petition for discretionary review, we granted his motion for rehearing in order to…