Legal Opinion
Meyerfeld v. South San Joaquin Irrigation District
California Supreme Court
Decided April 30, 1935No. S. F. 15271Published
1Opinion of the Court
3 Cal.2d 409 (1935)
MORRIS MEYERFELD, Jr., et al., Petitioners,
v.
SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT et al., Respondents; MARY E. MORRIS et al., Interveners.
S. F. No. 15271.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
April 30, 1935.
McKinstry, Haber & Coombes, McKinstry & Haber and Pierce Coombes for Petitioners.
Thomas J. Straub and W. R. Dunn, as Amici Curiae on Behalf of Petitioners.
Nutter & Rutherford for Respondents.
W. Coburn Cook and Clark, Nichols & Eltse for Interveners.
SHENK, J.
Mandamus to compel the respondent district and its officers to pay interest and principal on certain outstanding…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- W. B. Worthen Co. v. KavanaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- McDonald v. HoveySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Hershey v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- McCoy v. BriantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- Mulcahy v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.