Legal Opinion

State Ex Inf. North Todd Gentry v. American Can Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 17, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITE, J.-

This proceeding in quo warranto, begun by the Attorney-General, has for its purpose to oust respondent from its corporate franchises and to declare the same forfeited, the petition alleging non-user.

The petition of relator was lodged with the clerk of this court December 2, 1925, but for some reason was not marked “Filed” until December 11, 1925. The respondent, March 10, 1926, filed return, denying the allegations of the petition, except such as it specifically admitted to be true; alleged compliance with the statute in filing reports ; that the State of Missouri is estopped to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex inf. Hadley v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. State ex inf. Hadley v. Delmar Jockey ClubSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  3. State v. VaughanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  4. Litton v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. Underwood v. CaveSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Inf. Atty-Gen. v. Long-Bell Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  2. State ex el. Schneider's Credit Jewelers, Inc. v. BrackmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  3. State Ex Rel. Brown v. WoodsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API