Legal Opinion

Busby v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided August 28, 1997No. 03-97-00034-CRPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant pleaded guilty to misapplying fiduciary property. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 32.45 (West 1994). 1 The district court adjudged appellant guilty and assessed punishment at imprisonment for ten years, but suspended imposition of sentence and placed him on community supervision. Appellant challenges two of the conditions of supervision ordered by the district court.

Condition eleven orders appellant to pay court costs totaling $230,926.71. Contained in these costs is $230,695.21 paid by Bell County to the prosecutor pro tem appointed to represent the State in this cause. See Tex.Code…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  2. Montgomery v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Wooley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  4. Keith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1996
  5. Mayfield v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Busby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  2. Latricia Tyler v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2018
  3. Billy Joe Hamilton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
  4. Busby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  5. Busby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API