Legal Opinion

Stanley Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 16, 1960No. Appeal No. 241PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Watkins, J.,

In this unemployment compensation case the claimant-appellant, Howard E. Stanley, was denied benefits on the ground that he was disqualified under the provisions of Section 401(d) of the Unemployment Compensation Law of 1936, as amended, 43 PS §801 (d) in that he was unavailable for suitable work. The Bureau of Employment Security had disqualified him under §402(d) of the law but the referee changed this finding to a violation of §401 (d), supra, which was affirmed by the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review.

The claimant is 68 years of age and is receiving social…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Riehl v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Davis Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Pinto Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Rabinowitz Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Barron Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Urista v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API