State v. Smalls
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.
Defendants in consolidated cases appeal a Court of Appeals decision affirming their convictions of burglary (Simcox) and murder (Smalls).
The dispositive issue before us is whether a. presumption of prejudice to a defendant arises when the trial court, pursuant to CrR 6.7, allows the jury to separate after deliberations have begun. We hold that CrR 6.7 does not authorize separation of the jury after deliberations begin and that *757RCW 4.44.300 creates a presumption of prejudice to the defendant if the jury is separated during deliberations. Accordingly, we reverse the conviction of Simcox.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. CunninghamWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Krystad v. LauWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Emwright v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. StiltnerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. CrowellWashington Supreme Court · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. DictadoWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- American Continental Ins. Co. v. SteenWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. BockmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. NgWashington Supreme Court · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.