Legal Opinion

Moore v. Dobyns

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 19, 1939No. 28903PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court of Haskell county sustaining a demurrer to plaintiff’s evidence in an action brought to recover upon a promissory note.

March 23, 1935, Dicy Moore, admin-istratrix of the estate of Earl Moore, sued the named defendants alleging that: April 19, 1919, defendants executed and delivered to Earl Moore their promissory note in the amount of $4,-000, due November 1, 1919; August 13, 1926, Earl Moore died intestate and plaintiff was duly appointed adminis-tratrix and was holding the note; said note was past due, no interest having been paid after…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chickasha Inv. Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Hyde Construction Co. v. StevensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Herrian v. Union Equity Co-Operative ExchangeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Moseley v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. TuckerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allen v. HickmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  2. Drouillard v. Jensen Construction Co. of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  3. Drouillard v. JENSEN CONST. CO. OF OKLAHOMASupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API