Legal Opinion

Moseley v. Smith

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 17, 1935No. 24915PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal presents error from the district court of Muskogee county, Okla. Plaintiff in error, C. M. Moseley, was defendant in the trial court, and defendant in error, Maggie Smith, was plaintiff in the trial court. The parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant, as they appeared in the lower court.

Plaintiff, a teacher in the public schools of the city of Muskogee, in her second amended bill of particulars, sued defendant and others, as will hereinafter be more fully stated, for having exacted of her usury in violation of the statutes of Oklahoma. To be more specific, she…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Thomas v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Ross v. BreeneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Tennessee Finance Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
  4. Rose v. Woldert Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Brown v. First National Bank of TempleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Weatherman v. Victor Gasoline Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. Neff v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  3. Seaborn v. Preferred Acc. Ins. Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Moore v. DobynsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Wilson v. PlummerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API