Rabinovitch v. Auerbach
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHofstadter, J.
The plaintiff and the defendant are now both residents of California and according to the affidavits on the present motion have been such residents for many years. The action is brought upon a contract alleged in the complaint to have been made in Paris in 1937, between the plaintiff and one Pressburger, on the one hand, and with the defendant acting on his own behalf and on behalf of Elekta-Film, A. G., a corporation of Czechoslovakia, controlled by the defendant (referred to herein as Elekta) on the other. The plaintiff and Pressburger were at the time the sole shareholders of a German…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Werfel v. Zivnostenska BankaNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Greenleaf v. Safeway Trails, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Hutchinson v. . WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Turner v. American Metal Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- Wertheim v. ClergueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dar El-Bina Engineering & Contracting Co. v. Republic of IraqDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- McAvoy v. Young HarronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- Janklow v. WilliamsNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- In re the Estate of MorrisNew York Surrogate's Court · 1965
- Wooldridge Bros. v. TowneNew York Supreme Court · 1960