Yarbrough v. Yarbrough
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
In this action for separate maintenance the default of the defendant was duly taken, and a default judgment and decree entered. Thereafter, defendant moved to set aside his default. The motion was granted. The wife appeals.
The appeal is presented on appellant’s brief alone, respondent having failed to file a brief in support of the order. This failure imposes an unnecessary burden on this court, and at least raises the inference that respondent concedes that the appeal is meritorious. (Bendlage v. Kohlsaat, 54 Cal.App.2d 136 [128 P.2d 691]; Postin v. Griggs, 66 Cal.App.2d 147 [151 P.2d 887];…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Bailey v. TaaffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Benjamin v. Dalmo Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Waybright v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Shearman v. JorgensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Elms v. ElmsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Yarbrough v. YarbroughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956