Legal Opinion

Minnesota Automatic Merchandising Council v. Salomone

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 24, 2004No. C0-03-65PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, RUSSELL A., Justice.

The issue for resolution in this case is whether the taxation of sales of food through vending machines violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution or the Uniformity Clause of the Minnesota Constitution. We conclude that it does not.

The Minnesota Automatic Merchandising Council (MAMC) is a nonprofit membership organization made up of corporations, individuals and partnerships that operate and supply vending machines. MSY Enterprises, d/b/a Apple Automatic Food Service (Apple), a member of MAMC, is a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Louisville Gas & Electric Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Miller Brewing Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Wegan v. Village of LexingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. Guilliams v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hutchinson Technology, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  2. Schober v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. Singer v. CommissionerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  4. State v. CoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API