Winkelman v. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BROSKY, Judge.
This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment entered in favor of appellee, Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan (hereinafter PFRACP). Appellant, Michael Winkelman, presents the following issues for our review: (1) whether the Motor Vehicle Code requires a motor vehicle, which is not exempted from the registration provisions of the code, to be registered even though the vehicle is not driven or moved upon a highway, and if so, (2) whether the vehicle must be insured pursuant to the financial responsibility provisions of the Motor Vehicle Financial…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Masland v. BachmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Daley-Sand v. West American InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- McCormick v. Northeastern BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Allen v. Erie InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. SaulSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hodges v. RodriguezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Christopher M's Hand Poured Fudge, Inc. v. HennonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Chalkey v. RoushSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Chambers v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Midlake on Big Boulder Lake, Condominium Ass'n v. CappuccioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.