Legal Opinion
Bedell v. Reagan
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided June 21, 1963PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
The plaintiffs are husband and wife. The husband owned and operated an automobile in which his wife was a passenger. The automobile collided with one driven by the defendant. For consequential injuries and losses the plaintiffs instituted this twofold complaint against the defendant who answered upon the merits, denying liability.
Defendant sought recourse to Rule 14 (a), Maine Rules of Civil Procedure, 155 Me. 504, and in the role of a third-party plaintiff filed his complaint against the plaintiff husband who was designated therein as third-party defendant. This sequential complaint ascribed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fisher v. DiehlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Kiser v. SchlosserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Hobbs v. HurleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1918
- Kimball v. BauckmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1932
- Anthony v. AnthonySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1937
3Cited by43 opinions
- Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Transport Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Myrick v. JamesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Iowa Power and Light Co. v. Abild Construction Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- Globus, Inc. v. Law Research Service, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Sitzes v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.