Legal Opinion
Wilburn v. EASTMAN KODAK CORP.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided November 23, 2009No. 04-CV-6589LPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge.
This action was brought by an African-American plaintiff, David Wilburn, against his former employer, Eastman Kodak Corp. (“Kodak”) under Title VII of the CM Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. The complaint, which was filed pro se, asserts six bases for plaintiffs claims, all relating generally to Kodak’s alleged discrimination against plaintiff on account of his race, and its alleged retaliation against him for complaining about that discrimination.
Kodak has moved for summary judgment. Plaintiff, who is now…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Marvel Characters, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Joseph H. Simon, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Edp Medical Computer Systems, Inc. v. United States of America, Docket No. 06-0106-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Lucille Qualls Woods v. Dunlop Tire CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Maharaj v. Bankamerica Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Davis v. State of New York Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- McAvey v. Orange-Ulster BOCESDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011