Legal Opinion
McAvey v. Orange-Ulster BOCES
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 12, 2011No. 07 Civ. 11181PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Orange-Ulster Board of Cooperative Educational Services (“BOCES”), Jeffrey Smith (“Smith”), Jake McHale (“McHale”) and Marguerite Flood (“Flood”) (collectively, the “Defendants”) have moved for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, seeking dismissal of the complaint of the plaintiff Colleen McAvey (“McAvey” or the “Plaintiff’). Based upon the facts and conclusions set forth below, the motion is denied in part and granted in part.
I. Prior Proceedings
McAvey filed her complaint on December 12, 2007, alleging that the Defendants…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Garcetti v. CeballosSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stajic v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Iron Workers Locals 40, 361 & 417 Health Fund v. DinniganDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Capogrosso v. GelbsteinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2019
- Christopher J. Maderia v. The Village of South Blooming GroveDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Clark v. BoughtonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.