Legal Opinion

Jarka Company v. Gancl

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 13, 1926PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUestee, J.

At the trial of this case the defendant corporation asked for a directed verdict in its favor on the ground that there was no legally sufficient evidence of the violation of any legal duty of the defendant towards the plaintiff, its employee, and that the uncontradicted evidence proved the plaintiff to he guilty of negligence directly contributing to the accident and injury which occasioned the suit. The court refused to so instruct the jury, and the defendant’s exception to that ruling raises the principal question to bo considered on this appeal.

The defendant is a stevedoring company, and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Atlantic Transport Co. of W. Va. v. ImbrovekSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. State Industrial Comm'n of NY v. Nordenholt Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Yates v. McCullough Iron Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
  5. Taylor v. Robert Ramsay Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cramer v. Housing Opportunities CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Athas v. HillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  3. Wood v. AbellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  4. Hastings v. MechalskeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. Athas v. HillCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API