Legal Opinion

Athas v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 22, 1984No. 68, September Term, 1983PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

In this case, we are faced with the question of whether Maryland Code (1957, 1979 Repl.Vol., 1983 Cum.Supp.) Article 101, § 58 authorizes an employee to sue a supervisory coemployee for negligently discharging the employer’s duty to provide a safe place to work. We conclude that supervisory coemployees may be subject to liability only for negligently breaching a duty of care which they personally owe to the employee. Therefore, we shall affirm the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals in Athas v. Hill, 54 Md.App. 293, 458 A.2d 859 (1983).

Robert Lee Hill was employed as a chef…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Canter v. Koehring CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  2. Hauch v. ConnorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  3. Baltimore Transit Co. v. State Rx Rel. SchrieferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  4. State Ex Rel. Badami v. GaertnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Evans v. MorsellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Rivera Santana v. Superior Packaging Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1992
  2. Woodson v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Bryant v. Better Business Bureau of Greater Maryland, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1996
  4. Beye v. Bureau of National AffairsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. Brady v. Ralph Parsons Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1987

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API