Legal Opinion

United States v. Myrtle Canon

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 19, 1954No. 13956PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Chief Judge.

The United States appeals from a judgment of the District Court awarding Myrtle Canon damages for negligence in an operation on her and operation treatment by Army surgeons in the DeWitt General Hospital near Auburn, California, in which she was serving as a civilian medical secretary.

The case was before us on appeal from a judgment dismissing the complaint. We reversed and remanded for a new trial, 9 Cir., 188 F.2d 444, 446, stating:

“We are of opinion that this testimony, coupled with the official record stating the source of appellant’s admission, was prima facie…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sinz v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Canon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bernardo Balancio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  2. Rosario v. American Export-Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Berry v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1957
  4. Kapuschinsky v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1966
  5. Joseph J. Proietti v. Edward H. Levi, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API