Legal Opinion

Canon v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 16, 1951No. 123394_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEALY, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying recovery in a suit brought under the Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346, 2671 et seq. The trial court, sitting without a jury, ordered a dismissal at the close of the case for the plaintiff. The opinion of the judge outlining the situation and giving his reasons for the judgment is reported in Cannon v. United States, D.C., 84 F.Supp. 820. His opinion dispenses with the need for any extended discussion here.

The testimony of the plaintiff was that while she had varicose veins prior to her being employed in the DeWitt General…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dahn v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Parr v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  3. Cannon v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1949

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bernardo Balancio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  2. Watt v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1954
  3. Berry v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1957
  4. Rufino v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
  5. United States v. Myrtle CanonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API